Vote for Humanity

Uganda Begins Term on UN Security Council

voteforhumanity — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:20:26 +0000

Uganda began a two-year term on the United Nations Security Council last week, with its ambassador saying the country will use the opportunity to focus closer international attention on African conflicts.

Uganda’s will be the most prominent voice of Africa as the UN’s most powerful body grapples in the coming months with several East African issues, including chaos in Somalia, war in Sudan’s Darfur region and worsening violence on Uganda’s own doorstep in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

Some analysts speculate that Uganda may press the Security Council to allow UN forces stationed in the DRC and Sudan to join the hunt for Lord’s Resistance Army fighters.

The group led by Joseph Kony is accused of having massacred hundreds of Congolese civilians in the closing days of 2008.

In a recent interview on UN Radio, Ugandan ambassador Francis Butagira suggested that the country will press the Security Council to approve international intervention in Somalia while maintaining a hands-off posture in regard to other African hot spots such as Zimbabwe.

Mr Butagira said the Council should refrain from “efforts to have regime change in some countries.” In what could be interpreted as a reference to the US invasion of Iraq, the Ugandan envoy said that “unilateralism or flexing of muscles has been shown not to work.”

He made clear that Uganda would not favour moves by powers outside Africa to topple Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe.

Noting that Uganda supports the African Union position on Zimbabwe, Mr Butagira said the crisis there is “best dealt with by the sub-region” through the Southern African Development Community.

The issue of Zimbabwe does not have an international security dimension and thus “does not warrant intervention by the Security Council,” Mr Butagira said.

The ambassador also cited the African Union stance when asked about the International Criminal Court’s pending charges of genocide against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.

The AU urged the Security Council in July to use its power to suspend the indictment against President al-Bashir on the grounds that international criminal proceedings against him would only further destabilise the Darfur region.

But even as he implied Uganda’s willingness to press the Council for such a deferral, Mr Butagira cautioned that efforts to shield President al-Bashir from prosecution should not be viewed as “a blanket endorsement” of Sudan’s policies. The Ugandan ambassador noted that the AU has called for improvements in Sudan’s human-rights record.

“Sudan will be wise to do that,” Mr Butagira said. He added that Africa is concerned with “balancing the issue of justice and reconciliation” in Sudan.

On Somalia, the Security Council has a responsibility to authorise UN intervention, Mr Butagira said.

Other Council members, including the United States, have likewise argued for dispatch of a UN force to Somalia, but such an initiative appears unlikely to be launched until warring Somali factions act to resolve their differences.

In his UN Radio interview, Mr Butagira emphasised, “It is incumbent on African countries themselves to see what they can do to help Somalia.” Uganda’s own approach has been based, he said, on a decision “to help our brothers” in Somalia. He urged other African countries to join Uganda and Burundi in supplying troops for the African Union mission already deployed in Somalia.

Mr Butagira set his goals high when asked what he hoped the Council might achieve by the time Uganda’s term expires at the end of 2010.

He expressed hope that conflicts in Africa will have been resolved by then and that the continent will be focused squarely on its development needs.

Starting on New Year’s Day, Uganda took over a Security Council seat previously occupied by South Africa.

Uganda won 181 votes from the UN General Assembly’s 192 members in an election in October in which Austria, Japan, Mexico and Turkey were also awarded non-permanent spots on the council.

Five countries — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — hold permanent seats on the Security Council where they also wield veto power.

Burkina Faso, Costa Rica, Croatia, Libya and Vietnam will hold the other rotating seats on the 15-member council through the end of 2009.

Uganda has twice previously been chosen for a Security Council seat —in 1966 and 1981.

Some critics sought unsuccessfully to block the country’s return to the globally prestigious position.

Writing in October for a popular online journal called The Huffington Post, US reporter Georgianne Nienaber noted that Uganda has been accused of wanton human-rights violations and resource plundering in the eastern DRC. Her posting was headlined: “Uganda does not deserve seat on UN Security Council; it’s time to pay attention.”

Ms Nienaber’s commentary cited remarks by a leader of the US-based advocacy group Friends of the Congo who described Uganda as “certainly an agent of the US wreaking havoc on the African continent, particularly in Congo.”

http://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/-/2558/509860/-/view/printVersion/-/l7fjg4z/-/index.html

UN Rewards Uganda’s Militarism

voteforhumanity — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:45:15 +0000

Uganda’s And United Nations’ Despicable Travesty

[Black Star News Editorial September 23rd, 2008]

The United Nations is on the verge of embarrassing itself by committing a travesty of incurable proportions; member states may vote for Uganda, whose president’s militarism may be responsible for nine million deaths in Africa, and several wars of aggression, to take a seat on the UN Security Council.

The outrage must be denounced and rejected.

The role of the United Nations Security Council is to protect and enforce international law; it is preposterous for a nation-state that wantonly and repeatedly violates these laws to sit on the Security Council.

In 2005, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found Uganda liable for crimes against humanity, war crimes, massive destruction, and looting, as a result of its national army’s occupation of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): please see http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/116/10455.pdf

The United Nations itself as an organization was created to prevent these types of outrages against humanity.

Estimates of deaths in eastern Congo have reached seven million. Uganda was assessed $10 billion after the ICJ found it liable for the Congo crimes; not a single dollar has yet been paid. The Commander-in-Chief of Uganda’s army is the president, Lt. General Yoweri K. Museveni. He is in New York this week addressing the General Assembly. It’s because he enjoys US protection that he will not be served with an arrest warrant.

The Congo crimes, committed by Uganda troops and allied militias, and detailed in the World court’s findings, include mass rapes –using sexual assault as an instrument of terror, which was hitherto unknown in Congo—mass killings, burnings of people alive in their huts, and theft of Congo’s mineral and natural resources.

The ICC earlier this year indicted Jean Pierre Bemba, a Congolese warlord who was financed by Uganda, on separate war crimes; Bemba already is at the Hague awaiting trial. Human Rights Watch in a 2003 report, “Ituri: Covered In Blood,” identified at least 10 militias it said were Uganda-backed. These insurgent organizations were accused of crimes against humanity and war crimes.

Congo’s presidency, according to an article in The Wall Street Journal on June 8, 2006, referred the same allegations of crimes for which the ICJ found Uganda liable, to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for criminal investigation.

According to the Wall Street Journal’s report, once the court started its probe, Gen. Museveni contacted then U.N. Secretary General Annan and urged him to derail the ICC investigation. The Journal wrote: “President Museveni of Uganda asked U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to block the Congo investigation, according to one person familiar with the matter. Mr. Annan replied that he had no power to interfere with the court, this person said.” [Editor's Emphasis]

Uganda also is tied to the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

Whereas there had been relative peace between Hutu and Tutsi since the genocide that accompanied independence in the early 1960s, Uganda upset this delicate balance and re-ignited deep seated ethnic fears by invading Rwanda in October 1990; the warfare ended in genocide four years later after the assassination of Rwanda President Juvenal Habyarimana.

The officers that led the invasion into Rwanda were senior officers in the Ugandan army, including Fred Rwigyema and Paul Kagame; they were both sent for training in the United States by President Museveni before invading Rwanda. Citizens of Rwanda should contact a smart American lawyer and explore legal options against the United States for collaborating in the invasion that culminated in genocide.

Domestically, within Uganda itself, nearly 2 million ethnic Acholis, more than 90% of the population, have been confined inside death centers, where, according to a report by the World Health Organization (WHO), up to 1,000 civilians were dying per week through governmental neglect, resulting in starvation, dehydration, and deaths through treatable diseases.

Critics have denounced the Uganda government administered centers as “concentration camps” and the 10 to 15 years confinement as “slow motion genocide.” Between 600,000 to one million Acholis may have died in these camps during the period of these illegal detentions over the last decade. Please see: http://130.94.183.89/parker/sub01wsu.html

By comparison, the number of civilians killed by the vicious Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) rebels, during its 22 years war with the Uganda government, may not reach 22,000 since there has never been a report of 1,000 civilians being killed by the rebels in any one given year.

Now that the owners of fertile tracts of land in Acholi have been buried in mass graves, the Uganda government has cynically invited foreign investors to seize the land for commercial farming.

To reward General Museveni’s regime–after being involved in the deaths of seven million Congolese; one million Rwandese, and possibly another million Ugandans in Acholi—with a seat on the Security Council amounts to the following:

Travesty that exposes the United Nations and the Security Council to global ridicule, scorn, and contempt.
Interfering with the ongoing ICC investigation of alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against the people of DRC by Uganda’s army and its allied militias, as already established by the ICJ. The UN would, incongruously, be inviting a suspect –commander in chief Lt. Gen. Museveni—in alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity to sit on the very body, the Security Council, which is empowered to either suspend or to not suspend an indictment by the ICC.
Irreparably tarnishing the reputation of the Security Council; in particular challenging its mandate to end impunity of state and non-state actors.
Squandering the moral stature of the Security Council, without which its authority is compromised and its actions rendered meaningless.
Undermining the Security Council’s ability to deal with future crises, including wars of aggression, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
Violating the UN’s own charter, which forbids wars of aggression, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, which Uganda already has been established to have committed in DRC by the ICJ.
Promoting future wars of aggression, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and genocide, since the Security Council would no longer be able to play any deterrence role, having been compromised by rewarding a country that already was found to have committed these crimes, to sit on the Security Council. Moreover, the UN has also condemned Uganda –as well as the Lord’s Resistance Army rebels—for continued use and deployment of child soldiers in contravention of International laws. Please see: http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/crp/index.htm
Emboldening the Ugandan dictatorship to continue human rights abuse domestically and wars of aggression, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, regionally, having nothing to fear from the United Nations and the international community.
Betraying legitimate domestic opposition and resistance to the dictatorship, within Uganda.
Confirming to the world that hypocrisy rules regardless of beautiful phrases such as “the rule of law” and “human rights.”

In order for Uganda to be elected, it needs the support of the five countries that hold permanent seats on the Security Council –the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and China.

The Bush Administration is grateful to Museveni for sending a token military force to Somalia, ostensibly on a peace keeping mission; in reality, to shore up the U.S.-backed Ethiopian occupation.

Ironically, some members of the Uganda armed force now stationed in Somalia may have been involved in the Congo atrocities; the Bush Administration has been willing to disregard genocide in Africa as a result of General Museveni’s militarism, in return for short-term gains.

Anyone with a sense of human dignity, or any organization that still takes human rights and the UN Charter seriously and is horrified by this outrageous travesty, should protest in the strongest possible terms to ambassadors from the Five Permanent Member countries on the Security Council.

Send your letter of protest, or an e-mail message, or forward this Black Star News editorial, or call and speak with the respective ambassadors of:

The United States usa@un.int (212) 415-4000 Fax (212) 415-4443 ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad;

China (212) 655-6100 fax (212) 481-2998 ambassador Wang Guangya;

Russia rusun@un.int (212) 861-4900/4901 Fax (212) 628-0252 ambassador Vitaly I. Churkin;

United Kingdom uk@un.int (212) 745-9200 Fax (212) 745-9316 ambassador Sir Emyr Jones Parry;

and, France france@un.int (212) 308-5700 Fax (212) 421-6889 ambassador Jean-Marc de La Sablière.

Also call the United States Department of State as register your outrage to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at (202) 647-2492 Fax (202) 647-0244.

Please copy your letters of protest to Milton@blackstarnews.com or faxes to(866) 242-9689.

“Speaking Truth To Empower.”

http://www.blackstarnews.com/?c=122&a=4924

Huffington Post: Uganda Does Not Deserve Seat on UN Security Council, It’s Time to Pay Attention

voteforhumanity — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:53:09 +0000

There is a critical issue facing the United Nations Security Council in the coming weeks that gives the United States great leverage in Central Africa, but it has not merited a single mention, that we can find, in mainstream international news coverage.

An important question to ask the McCain campaign would be whether or not Sarah Palin met with any representatives of Uganda when she shook hands with world leaders at the United Nations. Katie Couric and CBS booted an opportunity to open a dialogue on Africa that has been occult, if it exists at all.

The Bush Administration has been very cozy with the leadership of Uganda. Will McCain and Obama follow suit? Should we care?”

«Read the full article